?

Log in

No account? Create an account
Something to chew over - Rotten Circuits
March 10th, 2010
08:53 am

[Link]

Previous Entry Share Next Entry
Something to chew over

(3 comments | Leave a comment)

Comments
 
[User Picture]
From:rumor_esq
Date:March 10th, 2010 05:09 pm (UTC)
(Link)
The reporting of the study, either in the article you linked or the further article linked therein, is pretty insufficient to be able to judge whether the claims made by the articles are founded by the study. There's repeated reference to the rape myth, but there's little evidence that acceptance of the rape myth was directly tested in the study. At best it seems it was studied by proxy - measuring acceptance of whether subjects agreed with statements like "places herself knowingly in a situation to provoke the sexual attention of men". I don't think a battery of such statement measurements would be irrelevant, but without knowing the details of the study, it's also impossible to tell whether the inference drawn here is sound at all. And if the articles are accurate, it sounds like the study may have reached conclusions not totally supported by the tests. It's probably more likely that the articles are mischaracterising or exaggerating the conclusions of the study, though.

Social science is murky, murky stuff, yo.
[User Picture]
From:wererogue
Date:March 10th, 2010 08:01 pm (UTC)
(Link)
Very true. I'd love to read the study itself. However, I'm more inclined to believe that the author at least *thinks* she's tested the point, as the second article is on Stanford's own site.
Powered by LiveJournal.com